0.00/0.11	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_8179 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.06/0.30	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.06/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.06/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.06/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.06/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.06/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.06/0.30	% WCLimit    : 180
0.06/0.30	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:15:38 EDT 2023
0.11/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.11/0.39	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NpMIy39CkY/Vampire---4.8_8179
0.11/0.39	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.11/0.39	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.11/0.39	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.11/0.39	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.11/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.11/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.11/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# post_as_ho1 with pid 8486 completed with status 0
0.11/0.40	# Result found by post_as_ho1
0.11/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.11/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.11/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# No SInE strategy applied
0.11/0.40	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.11/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.11/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# new_ho_10 with pid 8492 completed with status 0
0.11/0.40	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.11/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.11/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.11/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# No SInE strategy applied
0.11/0.40	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.11/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.11/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.11/0.40	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.11/0.40	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.11/0.40	
0.11/0.40	# Proof found!
0.11/0.40	# SZS status Theorem
0.11/0.40	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.11/0.40	thf(decl_22, type, esk1_0: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.11/0.40	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_2: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.11/0.40	thf(decl_24, type, epred2_0: $i > $o).
0.11/0.40	thf(decl_25, type, epred3_0: $i > $o).
0.11/0.40	thf(decl_26, type, epred4_1: $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.40	thf(decl_27, type, epred5_2: $i > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.11/0.40	thf(cTHM143_EXPANDB, conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > $i]:((?[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((?[X4:$i]:(~(((X2 @ X4)<=>(X3 @ X4))))&![X5:$i > $o]:(((X5 @ (X1 @ X3))|~((X5 @ (X1 @ X2)))))))|![X6:$i > $o]:((?[X3:$i > $o]:((~((X3 @ (X1 @ X6)))&(X3 @ (X1 @ (^[X7:$i]:(?[X8:$i > $o]:((~((X8 @ (X1 @ X8)))&![X9:$i > $o]:((~((X9 @ X7))|(X9 @ (X1 @ X8))))))))))))|(X6 @ (X1 @ X6)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NpMIy39CkY/Vampire---4.8_8179', cTHM143_EXPANDB)).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:($i > $o) > $i]:((?[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((?[X4:$i]:(~(((X2 @ X4)<=>(X3 @ X4))))&![X5:$i > $o]:(((X5 @ (X1 @ X3))|~(X5 @ (X1 @ X2))))))|![X6:$i > $o]:((?[X3:$i > $o]:((~(X3 @ (X1 @ X6))&(X3 @ (X1 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i]:(?[X8:$i > $o]:((~((X8 @ (X1 @ X8)))&![X9:$i > $o]:((~((X9 @ Z0))|(X9 @ (X1 @ X8))))))))))))|(X6 @ (X1 @ X6))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM143_EXPANDB])])])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X18:$i > $o, X19:$i > $o, X20:$i, X23:$i > $o]:(((((~(epred1_2 @ X18 @ X19 @ (esk1_0 @ X19))|(~(X18 @ X20)|(X19 @ X20)))&((epred1_2 @ X18 @ X19 @ (esk1_0 @ X18))|(~(X18 @ X20)|(X19 @ X20))))&((~(epred1_2 @ X18 @ X19 @ (esk1_0 @ X19))|(~(X19 @ X20)|(X18 @ X20)))&((epred1_2 @ X18 @ X19 @ (esk1_0 @ X18))|(~(X19 @ X20)|(X18 @ X20)))))&(((X23 @ (esk1_0 @ epred2_0))|~(X23 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i]:(?[X8:$i > $o]:((~((X8 @ (esk1_0 @ X8)))&![X9:$i > $o]:((~((X9 @ Z0))|(X9 @ (esk1_0 @ X8)))))))))))&~(epred2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ epred2_0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X26:$i]:(((epred3_0 @ X26)<=>?[X24:$i > $o]:((~((X24 @ (esk1_0 @ X24)))&![X25:$i > $o]:((~((X25 @ X26))|(X25 @ (esk1_0 @ X24)))))))), introduced(definition)).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X27:$i, X29:$i > $o, X30:$i, X31:$i > $o]:((((~(epred4_1 @ X27 @ (esk1_0 @ (epred4_1 @ X27)))|~(epred3_0 @ X27))&(~(X29 @ X27)|(X29 @ (esk1_0 @ (epred4_1 @ X27)))|~(epred3_0 @ X27)))&(((epred5_2 @ X30 @ X31 @ X30)|(X31 @ (esk1_0 @ X31))|(epred3_0 @ X30))&(~(epred5_2 @ X30 @ X31 @ (esk1_0 @ X31))|(X31 @ (esk1_0 @ X31))|(epred3_0 @ X30))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])])])])])])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk1_0 @ epred2_0))|~((((X2 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X4:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk1_0 @ X2))|(epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred5_2 @ X4 @ X2 @ (esk1_0 @ X2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk1_0 @ epred2_0))|~((X2 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ epred2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred5_2 @ X4 @ epred2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), c_0_8])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred5_2 @ X4 @ X2 @ X4)|(X2 @ (esk1_0 @ X2))|(epred3_0 @ X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X4)|~((epred1_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X3)))|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred1_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X2))|(X3 @ X4)|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_13, plain, (epred3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_8])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ X4)|~((epred1_2 @ X2 @ epred2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0)))|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_7])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((epred1_2 @ epred3_0 @ X2 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0))|(X2 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ epred3_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_7])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ X4)|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.11/0.40	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']).
0.11/0.40	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.11/0.40	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.11/0.40	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.11/0.40	# Initial clauses                      : 10
0.11/0.40	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.11/0.40	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
0.11/0.40	# Processed clauses                    : 38
0.11/0.40	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.11/0.40	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.11/0.40	# ...remaining for further processing  : 38
0.11/0.40	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.11/0.40	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.11/0.40	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.11/0.40	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.11/0.40	# Generated clauses                    : 65
0.11/0.40	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
0.11/0.40	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.11/0.40	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.11/0.40	# Paramodulations                      : 63
0.11/0.40	# Factorizations                       : 2
0.11/0.40	# NegExts                              : 0
0.11/0.40	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.11/0.40	# Total rewrite steps                  : 10
0.11/0.40	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.11/0.40	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.11/0.40	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.11/0.40	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.11/0.40	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.11/0.40	# Current number of processed clauses  : 27
0.11/0.40	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.11/0.40	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.11/0.40	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.11/0.40	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
0.11/0.40	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
0.11/0.40	# ...number of literals in the above   : 120
0.11/0.40	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.11/0.40	# Current number of archived clauses   : 11
0.11/0.40	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 79
0.11/0.40	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66
0.11/0.40	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.11/0.40	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.11/0.40	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.11/0.40	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.11/0.40	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.11/0.40	# Condensation attempts                : 38
0.11/0.40	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.11/0.40	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 2172
0.11/0.40	
0.11/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.11/0.40	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.11/0.40	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.11/0.40	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.11/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1876 pages
0.11/0.40	
0.11/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.11/0.40	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.11/0.40	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.11/0.40	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.11/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
0.11/0.40	% E---3.1 exiting
0.11/0.40	EOF